Obama’s Violation Of The First Amendment

Posted by Guest Writer on June 27, 2013 under Why | Read the First Comment

By Thomas Brewton

Dogged belief in humans’ ability to control the world’s climate is a matter of secular, socialistic religious doctrine. Imposing it via executive fiat amounts to unconstitutional establishment of a national religion.

Belief in global warming is not based upon legitimate science. Even its most ardent propagandists – the UN, NASA, and the New York Times – admit that there has been no meaningful global warming in more than a decade, the period in which high priest Al Gore predicted worldwide floods from melting polar ice caps.

Climate Gate revelations of “scientists” conniving to suppress evidence, to distort facts, and to fabricate lies wholesale made clear that the whole of global warming hysteria is, first, a greedy, cynical, and criminal conspiracy by practitioners of scientism (phony science) to extort money from the rest of us to feather their own nests.  Second, it is deeply believed religious doctrine by liberal-progressives, who firmly believe that having, in their imagination, killed God they can control and direct all of God’s natural world.

Just as reasonable arguments with Jihad suicide bombers are useless, so reasoning with the likes of Obama and his liberal-progressive backers is unavailing.  We are in a situation analogous to conditions that precipitated the Declaration of Independence in 1776.  A tyrannical George III and the British Parliament were bound and determined to impose their will upon the American colonies, even if doing so meant overriding the historical political liberties of Englishmen.

Given that global warming hysteria is unscientific and founded only in secular, socialistic religion, Obama is replaying the role of George III. His plan to impose industry-killing, jobs-destroying, and family budget-busting cost increases is unconstitutional tyranny.

There is some hope that Obama will not succeed. See Why Obama’s Plan to Cut Carbon Emissions Could Be DOA

For a summation of the destructive effects of Obama’s socialistic tyranny, see Obama Risks the Economy for the Sake of His EPA Legacy.

[Editor’s note: This article was originally published in The View From 1776 blog.]

Bookmark and Share

  • Dan Pangburn said,

    CO2 increase from 1800 to 2001 was 89.5 ppmv (parts per million by volume). The atmospheric carbon dioxide level has now increased since 2001 by 25.46 ppmv (an amount equal to 28.4% of the increase that took place from 1800 to 2001) (1800, 281.6 ppmv; 2001, 371.13 ppmv; May, 2013, 396.59 ppmv).

    The average global temperature trend since 2001 is flat. http://endofgw.blogspot.com/

    Rationalize that the temperature increase to 2001 was caused by a CO2 increase of 89.5 ppmv but that 25.46 ppmv additional CO2 increase had no effect on the average global temperature trend after 2001.

    A simple equation at http://climatechange90.blogspot.com/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html calculates average global temperatures since they have been accurately measured world wide (about 1895) with an accuracy of 90%, irrespective of whether the influence of CO2 is included or not. The equation uses a single external forcing, a proxy that is the time-integral of sunspot numbers. A graph is included which shows the calculated temperature anomaly trajectory overlaid on measurements.

Add A Comment